Local Planned Parenthood leader resigns...

[cheewiee]

http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2009/11/02/planned-parenthood-leader-changes-sides/

The leader of a local Planned Parenthood branch recently resigned after watching a sonogram of an abortion taking place. The above blog points to changes in technology that is causing the shift from our nation from being pro-choice to being a pro-life society.

Perhaps everyone contemplating an abortion should have to watch such a video, just to fully understand what it is that is growing inside of them, and the brutality of what it is they are asking for...

[onesawthelight]

I would agree with that comepletely. After losing a child at the end of the second trimester (the baby died) I was even more dead set against abortion. People don't understand what they are losing. A child, a real person. This is not a group of cells...it is a human being. There is a heartbeat in I believe eighteen days.

[Evanescence]

Its not a black/white issue for me...

I say this as i hold my 3 month old baby boy...

I do not support abortion for convenience....which is why 97% abortions haapen. I support life in prison or execution for abortionists...

[VerbumReale]

The plot has thickened. It seems that an injunction has been filed against her.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6700777.html

[Salome]

Family Planning my .......

Planned Parenthood is all about the cashola. No abortions = no Planned Parenthood.

Hallelujah this is in the news. I'm praying that more employees will be morally convicted. Will be subjected to watching exactly what happens ..... but moreso that abortion will end.

[Musicdude]

Its not a black/white issue for me...

I say this as i hold my 3 month old baby boy...

I do not support abortion for convenience....which is why 97% abortions haapen. I support life in prison or execution for abortionists...

Shouldn't the laws be made for the 97% and exceptions made for the few?

[Evanescence]

Shouldn't the laws be made for the 97% and exceptions made for the few?

yes

[Howlin' Wolf]

I find it quite hypocritical of this country's judicial system that a woman can abort a baby because it is her choice, and the father has no say. Furthermore, if the Father wants no part of the baby once born, the mother can sue him for 18 years of child support payments.

In addition, science has proven that life starts at conception and to kill a baby once "born" is considered murder. Yet, to kill that same life inside of the womb, is not murder. If life starts at conception, how can one logically make a distinction between "in the womb" and "outside the womb"? The logic of this argument is absolutely baffling. Let me take this one step further.

Since it is legal to kill an unborn child, why then is Scott Peterson in prison for a double murder charge because he killed Lacy Peterson, while she was carrying an unborn child?

[cheewiee]

I find it quite hypocritical of this country's judicial system that a woman can abort a baby because it is her choice, and the father has no say. Furthermore, if the Father wants no part of the baby once born, the mother can sue him for 18 years of child support payments.

In addition, science has proven that life starts at conception and to kill a baby once "born" is considered murder. Yet, to kill that same life inside of the womb, is not murder. If life starts at conception, how can one logically make a distinction between "in the womb" and "outside the womb"? The logic of this argument is absolutely baffling. Let me take this one step further.

Since it is legal to kill an unborn child, why then is Scott Peterson in prison for a double murder charge because he killed Lacy Peterson, while she was carrying an unborn child?

So it is not legal to kill an unborn child. Lacy's law changed that. But I agree with all of the above.. even more so now that I have seen an ultra sound of my babies beating heart...

[middletree]

I find it quite hypocritical of this country's judicial system that a woman can abort a baby ...

If life starts at conception, how can one logically make a distinction between "in the womb" and "outside the womb"? The logic of this argument is absolutely baffling.
Since it is legal to kill an unborn child, why then is Scott Peterson in prison for a double murder charge because he killed Lacy Peterson, while she was carrying an unborn child?


Because almost all our laws are made according to the wishes of the richest contributors. Babies don't have lobbying groups, but Planned Parenthood is the biggest name, but not the only one, in the multimillion dollar abortion industry. And they get their way when it comes to what's legal.

[WeaselInYerFoot]

The founder of Planned Parenthood (Margaret Sanger) wrote a very disturbing book in the early 1900's called "The Pivot of Civilization". It is quite scary, the things she calls for for the success of the country and society, one being the elimination of all negroes through sterilization. They lobbied for a legislated sterilization process for anyone who committed a crime. This would remove any minor individuals and their DNA from our world.

To stop this "multiplication," Sanger could be harsh. Her book, <The
Pivot of Civilization>, has a chapter called "The Cruelty of
Charity." In it she blasts as "insidiously injurious" programs to
provide "medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers." In other
words, Sanger wanted ethnic cleansing. Instead of helping the poor,
she considered them (particularly Blacks, Hispanics, and Jewish
immigrants) slum dwellers who would soon overrun the boundaries of
their slums and contaminate the better elements of society with their
inferior genes.


More can be found here (http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT).

[Salome]

http://www.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=364930 549d962f9f0b6b&utm_source=newsletter1110&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weeklytopvid eos

Here is an interview Mike Huckabee had with the woman who quit Planned Parenthood.