DC Madam...suicide very suspicious....

[Evanescence]

I knew this right off the bat....but it seems even more far reaching....

Could the DC madam and her escort serveice have known things about what really happened on 911? I asked this question on another forum..."Imagine what those women could find out, if they tried"

We may soon find out...

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1930

9/11 Conspiracy Connection To DC Madam Murder


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, May 5, 2008
Former NSA analyst and Navy intelligence officer Wayne Madsen tells the The Alex Jones Show that one of the key motives behind the DC Madam’s murder may have been the information her call girls picked up from Washington’s top brass concerning foreknowledge and government complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Madsen also connected another suspicious death - that of former CIA agent Roland Carnaby who was gunned down by Houston police last week - to another individual who was involved in both the 9/11 cover-up and the D.C. Madam scandal, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Noting that Palfrey and her defense team had tried to invoke the Classified Information Procedures Act in the U.S. District Court in Washington, which is only used when classified information or the names of people who are intelligence officers needs to be discussed, Madsen said Palfrey, "Had information which could have a bearing on the 9/11 attacks that some of her employees may have picked up information beforehand that would have been very useful to the 9/11 investigation."

Madsen added that most of Palfrey’s call girls had been active around the area of McLean Virginia, which is where the CIA and other intelligence agencies are based and where Dick Cheney lived at the time.
Host Alex Jones recalled that during interviews Palfrey had told him that her escort service was in fact being used as an intelligence operation to gather intelligence on individuals who used the escort service, particularly those connected to the military.

[danbos]

I saw 9/11 Conspiracy and couldn't go any further. ;)

[Valpo]

WHAT?! :confused:

good gosh man

[Jason]

I saw 9/11 Conspiracy and couldn't go any further. ;)

Ditto.

[rossid]

This must be why I just had gas...

[Howlin' Wolf]

E, dont you know that you cant post 9/11 conspiracy theories!!! jeez man, heat can melt steel. bulidings that are on fire normally implode on themselves! what are you thinking????

[Evanescence]

Yeah...lol, imagine that....her "Girls" had connections with high ranking military and Washington lawmakers....and she ends up dead. I can't imagine that her or her girls had any inside, sensitive info on Washington....

Gee, imagine that...what a coincidence...

Yeah, Tulip..that dirty little word "conspiracy". You know, none of them have never been proven true... :rolleyes:

You forgot the "coincidence" of the CIA and NORAD conducting terror drills featuring simulated hijacked airplanes over NYC the very morning of 911. Oh, and those Put options...

So many coincidences....Gee, imagine that.... :cool:

[Valpo]

So if this is as serious as you say/think it is E, why the smiley faces all the time?

[middletree]

E, dont you know that you cant post 9/11 conspiracy theories!!! jeez man, heat can melt steel. bulidings that are on fire normally implode on themselves! what are you thinking????

Is that sarcasm? Heat does melt steel, ya know. Rosie O Donnell says it doesn't but she isn't exactly an expert. In fact, that's how the beams get into the right shape: heat is used to make them malleable.

[Evanescence]

So if this is as serious as you say/think it is E, why the smiley faces all the time?


My smilies are usually sarcasm at those who are not open to false-flag or deceptive tactics for war by the US Govt or rogue versions thereof, DESPITE 100% credible proof that these style ops were planned and orchestrated in the past.

I just learned about Operation Himler....the series of false-flaggers Hitler used on Germany, blaming the bombings on Poland...which was the final straw which lead to their invasion. That was new to me.

It is a VERY serious subject but I have to laugh and scoff at the scoffers who are so close minded... :rolleyes:

Is that sarcasm? Heat does melt steel, ya know. Rosie O Donnell says it doesn't but she isn't exactly an expert. In fact, that's how the beams get into the right shape: heat is used to make them malleable.

I think its sarcasm...

The NIST has long since removed its Pancake theory and openly admits it has no clue why the twin towers and #7 failed. Experts on both sides are clear that most of the jet fuel burned/escaped on impact in the initiial fireball. Massive amounts of black smoke on the vids further prove the fire was an oxygen starved fire.

The NIST now has a new "'theory"....not sure what its called....but its not concrete or provable.

Rosie has been an eyesore for 911 Truth. She doesn't know jack.

I recently read an article that stated the port authority looked into dropping the Blds because of the asbestos issue. The cost to remove it was going to be staggering. After the 1993 botched CIA attack on the WTCs, the buildings were RE-fireproofed on top of the aspestos....so the fire idea is an absurd idea, really.

Fire/heat does melt steel and its true it would not have had melt the steel, only weaken it. But, the NIST itself admit the temp never got about 500*, not near enough heat OR time...the roughly 1 hr each building burned before dropping, for the steel to weaken. It just doesn't hold water given the circumstances and facts. There is no proof or real explaination of the WTCs- all 3 of them failing.

One last note, the European parliament recently held a 2 day summit discussing 911 and the accuracy of the official story. Leading 911 Truth expert and professor David Ray Griffin attended and presented FACTS for the people in attendance. The UN is also calling for a true, independent investigation...not like the one we had with a massive conflict of interest in Bush/Cheney/Rice cronie, Philip Zelikow.

Here's proof of the asbestos in the WTCs....the quote to clean it out? Over 1 billion dollars....Hmmm...imagine that.

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c97/scooterl/-WTCs-Aspestos.gif

[danbos]

Okay, Rosie O'donnel probably has no clue what she's talking about. How about a mechanical engineering student who has studied materials? Yes, heat melts steel. No, the fires probably did not get hot enough to melt the steel. But, heat will weaken steel, the hotter it gets, the weaker it gets. That means that there is a weak point in the steel beams at the floors where the crash occurred. The weight is meant to be distributed along the whole beam, but with the weak point in the middle, stress becomes concentrated at that point. Now, with the safety factor that is figured into the design, that's probably still not enough to topple the towers. But, it's easily conceivable that the crash could've damaged some of the support. If it so much as put a notch in one of the beams, the stress is even more concentrated, and could easily make one beam fail. If one beam failed, it would make the load on all the others greater, especially on the ones closest to the broken one, as well as putting a bending load on the existing beams.

[Howlin' Wolf]

Okay, Rosie O'donnel probably has no clue what she's talking about. How about a mechanical engineering student who has studied materials? Yes, heat melts steel. No, the fires probably did not get hot enough to melt the steel. But, heat will weaken steel, the hotter it gets, the weaker it gets. That means that there is a weak point in the steel beams at the floors where the crash occurred. The weight is meant to be distributed along the whole beam, but with the weak point in the middle, stress becomes concentrated at that point. Now, with the safety factor that is figured into the design, that's probably still not enough to topple the towers. But, it's easily conceivable that the crash could've damaged some of the support. If it so much as put a notch in one of the beams, the stress is even more concentrated, and could easily make one beam fail. If one beam failed, it would make the load on all the others greater, especially on the ones closest to the broken one, as well as putting a bending load on the existing beams.

thats a lot of "ifs".

[danbos]

thats a lot of "ifs".

Yeah, well the fact is, the buildings came down after airliners hit them. I'm just explaining that it is a possibility.

If you want a better explanation, here's an article on The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society's website. This is a quite well known society of people who have studied Materials Science.
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

And by the way E, talking about the $1 billion to clean up the asbestos is a perfect example of how to "lie" with statistics. Stated by itself, that seems like an enormous number, which might give reason to why the government might take the building out. But, the problem with that theory comes with the fact that it has costed close to $1 billion to clean up the mess...which is well under the initial estimates of $7 billion. The government would obviously crunch these numbers if they were thinking of taking out the building with some sort of conspiracy.

[Evanescence]

And by the way E, talking about the $1 billion to clean up the asbestos is a perfect example of how to "lie" with statistics. Stated by itself, that seems like an enormous number, which might give reason to why the government might take the building out. But, the problem with that theory comes with the fact that it has costed close to $1 billion to clean up the mess...which is well under the initial estimates of $7 billion. The government would obviously crunch these numbers if they were thinking of taking out the building with some sort of conspiracy.


Really? OK....good point...but who footed the bill? The Port authority? The insurace company?

Larry Silverstein was the lease holder....took it over 6 months before it happened. He changed the insurance policy to cover terror attacks....with airplanes. He pocketed 8 Billion dollars....claimed it was two different attacks...two planes. And won. Now, he's suing a bunch of people for 23 Billion....

Speaking of cleanup. The same demo company that was considered for the demolition was in charge of the cleanup. By whom? Gulianni. Its confirmed that the cleanup was rushed....the stell sent off to be melted down and the concrete and rumble sent to the bottom of the ocean.

This at a crime scene where the mayor of NYC is in charge? This is a GROSS incident at a CRIME SCENE. Gulianni should be chraged and tried for obstruction of justice and tampering with a crime scene. Lie detector his *** and lets get to the bottom of this.

So, who paid for the cleanup? Lets find out...

[Beachcomber]

Wow, someone like you must never get bored!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D