PDA

View Full Version : David Shuster's comment


Jesuslove
02-11-2008, 12:25 PM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=24122

"Pimping" Chelsea Crack Gets NBC's Shuster Suspended
The never-ending Democratic debate drama continued Friday -- and it didn't involve Fox. Or Obama.

This time it's NBC that may lose its debate for the comments of political correspondent David Shuster Thursday. Talking about ex-First Daughter Chelsea Clinton on the campaign trail Shuster said it was "a little bit unseemly to me that Chelsea's out there calling up celebrities, saying support my mom, and she's apparently also calling these super delegates," in a conversation with Bill Press.Then he said "Doesn't it seem like Chelsea's sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?"

Ohhhhh, Davey. Early Friday a.m., called in on-air and apologized for using the "slang" and "I didn't think that people would take it literally, but some people have." Yeah, Davey, we know you're trying to be down and all -- and yes, "pimped out" has become a more benign part of the language of ahem, Chelsea's generation -- but save it. All most people hear is "pimping" and someone's daughter. Possibly the next President's. You ain't winning this one.

Worse: You dropped "pimping" while you were guest-hosting on "Tucker" -- a show hosted by a man who wears bow ties. Not the right demo to drop a p-bomb.

Mama Clinton swung back hard and fast -- through chief campaign flak Howard Wolfson. Wolfie said the comment was "disgusting" and said The Hill isn't so sure she wants to show up on NBC to debate as planned this month. "We had agreed yesterday to do a debate on that network. And I at this point can't envision a scenario where we would continue to engage in debates on that network given the comments that were made and have been made."

MSNBC, whose political correspondents are no strangers to insulting the Clinton women -- acted quickly. It flicked Shuster off the bottom of its shoe before sundown Friday, saying he "has been suspended from appearing on all NBC News broadcasts, other than to make his apology (Friday). He has also extended an apology to the Clinton family. NBC News takes these matters seriously, and offers our sincere regrets to the Clintons for the remarks."

But is that enough? Can this debate be saved?

Ellen "Emily's List" Malcolm is pissed. (Can we say that?) Emily -- a huge Clinton fan -- wrote a letter to NBC news czar Phil Griffin Friday saying "the misogynistic pattern in the reporting by your network must come to an end. I know I speak for millions across this country when I demand that you take immediate steps and publicly tell us what you will do to eliminate this sexist and demeaning culture that has become so pervasive in your network."

Ouch.

Jesuslove
02-11-2008, 12:28 PM
In my opinion, David Shuster should be fired for this comment. It is totally inapproporate. Imus, who is a comedian, got fired by NBC, for making an equally offensive remark. David Shuster is not a comedian, and his comment is so reprehensive, they should just fire him, period. Anyone can disagree with a politician, but to take an unfair shot at the politician's daughter is just wrong.

Jake
02-11-2008, 01:23 PM
In my opinion, David Shuster should be fired for this comment. It is totally inapproporate. Imus, who is a comedian, got fired by NBC, for making an equally offensive remark. David Shuster is not a comedian, and his comment is so reprehensive, they should just fire him, period. Anyone can disagree with a politician, but to take an unfair shot at the politician's daughter is just wrong.

Not when the politician is using the daughter to get votes. Nobody would be all pissy if someone made a joke about Obama using Oprah's support.

Valpo
02-11-2008, 02:11 PM
free speech?

Libs are hilarious, they rail about free speech when someone from the right supposedly violates it, but if it is offending one of their own, the first amendment becomes an after thought. Let's just show a little consistency. I am no fan of NBC, or David Schuster, but I do not think there is an "absolute" here that he needs to be fired. If NBC so decides to fire him, I suppose that would be their right. I do not know what his contract says.

cheewiee
02-11-2008, 02:36 PM
free speech?

Libs are hilarious, they rail about free speech when someone from the right supposedly violates it, but if it is offending one of their own, the first amendment becomes an after thought. Let's just show a little consistency. I am no fan of NBC, or David Schuster, but I do not think there is an "absolute" here that he needs to be fired. If NBC so decides to fire him, I suppose that would be their right. I do not know what his contract says.

This isn't a free speech matter. Shuster isn't under threat of Prison for calling a former President's daughter a name...

NBC has to do the same thing here that it did in the case of Imus, will Shusters comments cost NBC enough Ad Revenue to make firing him worth it?

I am not sure the context of the quote, but it seems to me like he was editorializing... If he was editorializing the news, during a news broadcast, he should be fired... but that's just my two cents.....

And it is reprehensible that someone would call the former 1st Daughter that....

Valpo
02-11-2008, 03:12 PM
It is a horrible thing to say. Personally, although I am no fan of the Clinton's, but I think it's great Chelsea is forefront in her mother's campaign, shows family unity. But there is a definite double standard here.

Jesuslove
02-11-2008, 03:12 PM
Not when the politician is using the daughter to get votes. Nobody would be all pissy if someone made a joke about Obama using Oprah's support.

Oprah isn't Barack's daughter. I guarantee that if the "pimping" comment was made about Michelle Obama or one of the daughter's, Shuster would have been fired.

WeaselInYerFoot
02-12-2008, 01:10 PM
I don't know why they have to single her out. What she was doing was no different than any campaign volunteer would do. So if I stood out on the street and handed out slim jims for the Clintons (which I never would) then I'm also being pimped out?

But this isn't a free speech issue. He was on the job, and if the networks policies were violated, then he should deal with the consequences.

Valpo
02-12-2008, 02:43 PM
He was on the job, and if the networks policies were violated, then he should deal with the consequences.

I agree with this, and in my OP I stated I did not know the terms of his contract. If it is clear by his contract he should not be using such language, then he can be fairly suspended/axed. The fact he was merely suspended however, leads me to believe the network is kowtowing to the Clintons.