View Full Version : Hillary lies about Bilderberg connections...
Evanescence
01-20-2008, 10:29 PM
911 and NWO Truthers have been on the campaign trail hammering our crook politicians about their connections, past ilk and so on...
Some dudes cornered Hillary about her recent trip to Canada to speak for the Bilderberg group and she lied through her teeth, stating she had not. Our news media even covered it...its on this Vid. She was slippin' and a slidin' like a bucket full of eels...
Her and Bills connections to the Globalist CFR, Tri-lateral and Bilderbergs is beyond disturbing...
Enjoy!!!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9Wz5ShpBAmc&feature=related
hochspeyer
01-21-2008, 12:49 AM
I didn't even need to follow the link you so graciously provided ... Hillary is dangerous. Period.
clemsontigers23
01-21-2008, 03:11 PM
Not to take away from the topic at hand, but the phrase "9/11 Truthers" reminded me of a question posed to Ron Paul about the 9/11 Truthers during the New Hampshire debate where Paul officially seperated himself from the group and said he does not share their beliefs. He also asked that they stop making claims that he's a 9/11 Truther.
Anyways, Hillary and Obama are both dangerous. If either one wins, I can't even begin to describe the horror I would feel knowing they would be in office with a Democratic-controlled Congress for at least 4 years.
Evanescence
01-21-2008, 05:22 PM
Not to take away from the topic at hand, but the phrase "9/11 Truthers" reminded me of a question posed to Ron Paul about the 9/11 Truthers during the New Hampshire debate where Paul officially seperated himself from the group and said he does not share their beliefs. He also asked that they stop making claims that he's a 9/11 Truther.
Anyways, Hillary and Obama are both dangerous. If either one wins, I can't even begin to describe the horror I would feel knowing they would be in office with a Democratic-controlled Congress for at least 4 years.
Clemson, wanna bet RP DOES share some of the beliefs of the truthers? Wanna bet he DOES want a new investigation due to corruption? I'll wager you one 10.00 gift certificate to McDonalds. Done?
McCain is just as dangerous as Obama and Hilldegard. He's a Globalist and has been way too close to Bush and Cheney for my liking...
Huckabee and RP are the only two I will support....hands down.
clemsontigers23
01-21-2008, 08:00 PM
Clemson, wanna bet RP DOES share some of the beliefs of the truthers? Wanna bet he DOES want a new investigation due to corruption? I'll wager you one 10.00 gift certificate to McDonalds. Done?
McCain is just as dangerous as Obama and Hilldegard. He's a Globalist and has been way too close to Bush and Cheney for my liking...
Huckabee and RP are the only two I will support....hands down.
Hey, I watched and heard Ron Paul say it. He was actually embarassed at the question. So either Ron Paul isn't a 9/11 Truther or he's too embarassed to admit it so he lied about it.
I don't understand why McCain would be considered a globalist. I haven't seen any evidence of it, unlike the Bush's and Clintons where there is some evidence.
Evanescence
01-22-2008, 12:35 AM
Hey, I watched and heard Ron Paul say it. He was actually embarassed at the question. So either Ron Paul isn't a 9/11 Truther or he's too embarassed to admit it so he lied about it.
I don't understand why McCain would be considered a globalist. I haven't seen any evidence of it, unlike the Bush's and Clintons where there is some evidence.
When they asked him about a NEW investigation he said this, basically:
"I'd support a new investigation becuase in big government investigations there is always coverups..."
He may not be a Truther per say...but he does admit that a coverup could be in place....regardless how big or small, a coverup. And he's right and many others in Washington agree. He's been nice and professional about the crooks and madmen in Washington...only for his campaign though. I can tell he's holding back...
McCain?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relati ons
CFR- Council on Foreign Relations member AND Tri-lateral- both founded and run by David Rockefeller and other rich corporate elitists. I hated to see it 'cause I like McCain and some of his ideas...but he's in bed with madmen. I will never vote for a VFR or tri-lateral member. We must always remember what the CFR and tri-lateral are all about. Creating a NWO....no question.
BTW- I'll be on the road next week, I could use that McD's 10.00 :cool:
WeaselInYerFoot
01-22-2008, 02:35 AM
Hey, I watched and heard Ron Paul say it. He was actually embarassed at the question. So either Ron Paul isn't a 9/11 Truther or he's too embarassed to admit it so he lied about it.
I don't understand why McCain would be considered a globalist. I haven't seen any evidence of it, unlike the Bush's and Clintons where there is some evidence.
Yeah, Ron Paul doesn't believe the whole 9/11 conspiracy stuff. Thankfully. Governments can be sneaky at times, but that's just too far fetched. But at the same time, 9/11 truthers can still benefit from him because his intentions are to get the government out of the dark and keep it open as needed. At some point, with the all the security measures against terrorism, privacy starts to tip towards favoring government and we end up having a society where the government has more privacy than the people it's supposed to represent. The Constitution prevents this, and Ron Paul merely doing his job of upholding it.
As far as John McCain goes, look no further than his McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill.
As far as the original subject goes. They're not really part of a conspiracy theory, in the sense that it's a secret society. They have meetings and get-togethers all the time so it's not hard to find information about it. They also played a pretty big role in steam rolling the creation of the European Union.
Valpo
01-22-2008, 02:48 AM
At least McCain tried doing something about the immigration situation instead of just sitting there with a lot of talk but no ideas (this coming from someone who actually opposed the bill).
McCain has a clean record, and agree with him or not has worked for the people.
Jason
01-22-2008, 02:58 AM
At least McCain tried doing something about the immigration situation instead of just sitting there with a lot of talk but no ideas (this coming from someone who actually opposed the bill).
I read the comments on articles in the Arizona Republic and every time McCain is mentioned tons of people call him stuff like McLame because of his immigration stance. For the average Arizonan, illegal immigration is a huge issue and most of us want the illegals deported. I have a strong feeling McCain won't win his home state, or other border states for that matter.
Debbie
01-22-2008, 10:47 AM
... Hillary is dangerous. Period.
I agree. But, feel if I only had 2 choices, I would have to pick her over Obama whom I never heard of before. Thank Goodness we are not forced to choose in that sense!
My cousin though is all for Hilary, says he likes the idea of getting two presidents for the price of one. On one hand he has a point, on the other - he is out of his mind.
mat1583
01-22-2008, 10:59 AM
The Constitution prevents this, and Ron Paul merely doing his job of upholding it.
It's amazing how many politicians don't do their job at upholding the Constitution by completely ignoring it. It's not just amazing, but a bit worrisome.
-washboard
lilmikey
01-22-2008, 01:13 PM
911 and NWO Truthers have been on the campaign trail hammering our crook politicians about their connections, past ilk and so on...
Some dudes cornered Hillary about her recent trip to Canada to speak for the Bilderberg group and she lied through her teeth, stating she had not. Our news media even covered it...its on this Vid. She was slippin' and a slidin' like a bucket full of eels...
Her and Bills connections to the Globalist CFR, Tri-lateral and Bilderbergs is beyond disturbing...
Enjoy!!!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9Wz5ShpBAmc&feature=related
Whats new she lies about everything:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.